Skip to main content

Proposition 320 Information

Proposition 320

What is Prop #320?

If passed, Proposition 320 would require certain Arizona school districts, including FUSD, to spend at least 60% of operational spending on direct instructional expenses, with a phased compliance process beginning in FY 2027-28.

A graphic featuring a school icon and the text 'Who It Applies To:' detailing district criteria based on student population and county size.

An informational graphic titled 'HOW THE PHASE-IN WORKS:' featuring a purple bar chart and arrow icon.

An infographic detail stating, 'What it would require: At least 60% of operational spending would need to be classified as direct instructional expenses,' with a percent symbol.

Classroom Site Fund distributions will be reduced: 25% after one year of noncompliance 50% after two years 75% after three years 100% after four years

Understanding How School Spending Is Coded

Proposition 320 focuses on how district expenditures are categorized and coded, not simply whether a service supports students.Five accounting code categories displayed horizontally: Fund 001 M&O, Program 100 Regular Education, Function 1000 Instruction, Object 6610 Supplies, and Unit 111 District.

Under Prop 320, only expenditures classified as “Instruction” would cound toward the proposed 60% percent.

  • Operational spending: Day-to-day spending is grouped into seven categories including Instruction, Student Support, Instruction Support, Administration, Plant Operations, Food Services, and Transportation.
  • Classroom spending is broader: The Auditor General’s “classroom spending” measure combines Instruction + Student Support + Instruction Support. Prop 320 references only Instruction.
  • Important distinction: Some services that directly serve students are not coded as direct instruction under the current definitions.

What Counts as Direct Instruction?

The 60% requirement includes classroom instruction and certain related expenses, while many essential student and school services fall outside the direct-instruction code.

A purple heading reads 'Does Count:' followed by a bulleted list including teachers, assistants, supplies, field trips, athletics, and tuition.

A text list titled 'Does NOT Count:' detailing excluded school roles like Student Support, Instructional Support, and Administration.

FUSD FY 2025 Spending

A pie chart titled District's spending by operational area, accompanied by explanatory text and a color-coded legend.

 

Important note: The proposed 60% requirement applies to Instruction only (50.9%), not FUSD’s 69.1% total classroom spending, which also includes Student Support and Instruction Support.

 

A pie chart titled 'district spending by operational area' displays various budget allocations.

FUSD Potential Budget Impact

A diagram illustrating a calculation process with three blocks of text connected by an arrow and an equals sign. Total impact would be 9.1% or $9.796,347.

Using financial data from FY25, moving from 50.9% to 60% represents a 9.1%, or $9,796,347, shift in operational spending.

What This Means for FUSD

If Proposition 320 passes, FUSD would need to make a significant shift in how operational spending is allocated and coded over time while continuing to provide services to students, staff, and families.

An infographic panel titled WHAT WE KNOW details FUSD's FY25 instructional spending at 50.9% versus a proposed 60% requirement.

 

Text graphic titled 'Why It Matters:' with two bullet points detailing operational spending and essential services.

 

A graphic displaying a bulleted list titled "WHAT WE DON'T KNOW:" about FUSD budget adjustments, program changes, staffing, and implementation details.